We discuss the determinants of FDI over the regions of a large economy like India, and develop a framework drawn from the advantage concept of Kindleberger and from location theories rooted in regional science. We specifically use Stephen Hymer's understanding of the parallels and relationship between the international organisation of a global firm and the locational choices for the same with the spatial aspects of location of economic activities in general. We apply the same to the situation in India of large FDI flows since the reform began in 1991-92 to arrive at a tentative explanation of the regional patterns of FDI. Essentially we argue that for all investments (other than those strictly confined to locations due to their requirements of either natural resources or the need to be very close to markets) it is the regions with metropolitan cities, that have the advantage in 'headquartering' the country operations of MNCs in India, that therefore attract the bulk of FDI. Even more than the quantum of FDI, the number of cases of FDI, as also the employment effects, and spillover effects are large for such regions. Empirical support for this hypothesis is provided by a study of the foreign investment intentions, and the distribution of investment projects. Gujarat has been particularly handicapped in not having a large and metropolitan city unlike the southern states which have Bangalore, and Hyderabad besides the older metropolis of Chennai. The area around Delhi, and Maharashtra its two metropolitian cities - Mumbai and Pune, have large advantage. Adjusting for these factors the FDI into Gujarat was large enough over the period when the state had grown rapidly in the first six years following the reform of 1991-92. Since then the slow down of the growth has been a retardant to FDI since the kind of FDI that Gujarat can hope for are largely industrially oriented. Similarly regulatory uncertainty especially with regard to gas, but also electric power and more generally in the physical infrastructure sectors had hurt Gujarat more than other states. We conclude by suggesting that there are vast gains to be made by attracting FDI, especially in services, high tech, and skilled labour seeking industries, because then the resulting operations are more externally oriented, and the investments arise from competing firms. Gujarat therefore needs to worry about these investments can come about. Its fortunes are likened very closely with the growth of manufacturing in the country as a whole.
